From 056f7f2d62aab282081985b4f2950817fe564c55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrick Mackinlay Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 18:17:27 +0800 Subject: eeprom: don't check endianness (nw) I don't know why this check for endianness is here, but I don't believe it's appropriate. --- src/devices/machine/eeprom.cpp | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/devices/machine/eeprom.cpp b/src/devices/machine/eeprom.cpp index 48bed1af960..b5866d3fd4c 100644 --- a/src/devices/machine/eeprom.cpp +++ b/src/devices/machine/eeprom.cpp @@ -258,8 +258,8 @@ void eeprom_base_device::nvram_default() fatalerror("eeprom region '%s' wrong size (expected size = 0x%X)\n", tag(), eeprom_bytes); if (m_data_bits == 8 && m_region->bytewidth() != 1) fatalerror("eeprom region '%s' needs to be an 8-bit region\n", tag()); - if (m_data_bits == 16 && (m_region->bytewidth() != 2 || m_region->endianness() != ENDIANNESS_BIG)) - fatalerror("eeprom region '%s' needs to be a 16-bit big-endian region\n", tag()); + if (m_data_bits == 16 && m_region->bytewidth() != 2) + fatalerror("eeprom region '%s' needs to be a 16-bit region\n", tag()); osd_printf_verbose("Loading data from EEPROM region '%s'\n", tag()); memcpy(&m_data[0], m_region->base(), eeprom_bytes); -- cgit v1.2.3